CP
CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. (CPSS)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 revenue rose 7.8% year over year to $108.4M, while diluted EPS was flat at $0.20; pretax income improved modestly to $7.0M .
- Against Wall Street consensus, CPS missed on EPS ($0.20 vs $0.25*) and revenue ($108.4M vs $111.5M*); the quarter had no fair value mark, which reduced revenue comparability vs prior year .
- Credit metrics mixed: total delinquencies improved slightly YoY (13.96% vs 14.04%), but annualized net charge-offs elevated to 8.01% (vs 7.32% YoY) amid vintage mix and recoveries still in low-30s .
- Funding capacity strengthened: a $167.5M revolving credit facility closed post-quarter and a $418.33M ABS deal earlier in 2025, supporting liquidity and origination capacity .
- Stock reaction catalysts: estimate misses and elevated charge-offs could weigh near term; counter-catalysts include improving vintages, cost efficiencies, and potential margin tailwinds if interest rates decline .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “We now have tons of funding” following the new revolving credit line and successful securitization despite industry noise (Tricolor), reinforcing access to capital .
- Operating efficiencies: core OpEx measured as % of managed portfolio fell to ~4.6% in Q3 from 5.4% YoY; headcount down ~3% YTD while portfolio reached an all-time high .
- Vintage quality improving: 2024 and early 2025 vintages show better default curves; troubled 2022-2023 vintages now below 30% of portfolio and running off .
What Went Wrong
- Annualized net charge-offs increased to 8.01% vs 7.32% YoY, reflecting still-elevated losses in older vintages and recoveries in low 30s .
- Net interest margin dipped YoY (Q3: $49.32M vs $50.52M YoY) largely due to higher interest expense from securitization debt growth and market costs .
- Growth tempered: contracts purchased fell sequentially (Q3: $391.1M vs Q2: $433.0M), with dealers reporting lower foot traffic and competition intensifying; management characterized 2025 growth as modest vs hopes .
Financial Results
Results vs Prior Periods and Estimates
Results vs Wall Street Consensus
Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Originations & Portfolio KPIs
Guidance Changes
No formal revenue, margin, OpEx, OI&E, tax rate or dividend guidance was issued.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We did add a new credit line just after the quarter, so that was a big plus. We now have tons of funding... we were pretty easily able to get the securitization done, slightly more expensive than we had hoped” .
- CFO: “We did not have a fair value mark this quarter. We did have a $5.5 million mark in the third quarter of last year” .
- COO: “Recoveries remain relatively light, settling in the low 30s… 2024 vintage at 36%, and 2025 vintage so far at 42%” .
- CEO: “We’re going to try and maintain our APRs and put most of [rate declines] into the margin… cash posted in our securitizations [2022-2023] will start rolling back out… towards the beginning to mid next year” .
Q&A Highlights
- The transcript primarily contained prepared remarks; no discrete analyst Q&A captured. Clarifications provided included: absence of fair value mark this quarter vs $5.5M in Q3’24 ; securitization market stability despite Tricolor issues ; and expectations for margin/cash tailwinds as rates decline and older securitizations amortize .
Estimates Context
- EPS missed consensus ($0.20 vs $0.25*), and revenue missed ($108.4M vs $111.5M*) .
- With one active estimate contributor, near-term adjustments likely to reflect higher NCOs and lack of fair value mark this quarter; potential medium-term upward revisions if interest rate declines materialize and vintage improvement continues .
Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term: Expect conservative sentiment given EPS and revenue misses and elevated charge-offs; watch for December/January rate path headlines as margin catalysts .
- Liquidity strong: New $167.5M facility and consistent ABS execution support origination and portfolio growth capacity .
- Structural efficiency: Core OpEx ratio continues to trend down; faster funding and headcount discipline are tangible levers to defend ROA .
- Credit mix improving: As 2022/2023 vintages run off and 2024/2025 vintages scale, losses and recoveries should normalize; monitor quarterly NCOs and recoveries .
- Fair value marks: Absence of FV mark in Q3 reduced reported revenue vs prior year; future marks could introduce volatility—factor into model variance .
- Competitive dynamics: Banks and credit unions’ re-entry may pressure growth; CPS’s 90% franchise dealer mix and relationship focus help sustain capture rates .
- Medium-term thesis: Rate declines, cash release from older securitizations, and improved vintages could lift NIM and earnings in 2026 if macro remains benign .